Ajijul Goldar And ANR. v. State Of West Bengal

16.07.2025 SL No.40 Court No.32 S.Gayen

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M.(A) 2011 of 2025 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Haringhata Police Station Case No. 295 of 2025 dated 04.05.2025 under Sections 85/109/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

-AndIn the matter of: Aijul Goldar & Anr.

...Petitioners

Ms. Minoti Gomes ...for the Petitioners Mr. Bidyut Roy Mr. Anindya Sundar Chatterjee ...for the State

1. This instant application has been filed with a prayer for anticipatory bail.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that there are omnibus allegations in the written complaint against the petitioners who are the parents-in-law.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail prayer and drawn my attention to the documents and statement of minor daughter of the de facto complainant recorded under Section 164 of CrPC involving serious allegations against two brothers-in-law.

4. The chargesheet has already been submitted in connection with this case.

5. Having heard the learned counsel and the materials placed before this Court, I find no reason to disallow the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

7. I direct that in the event of arrest, both the petitioners will be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, with one surety of like amount, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS, and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

8. Thus, the application for anticipatory bail being C.R.M. (A) 2011 of 2025 stands disposed of.

(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)