Archana Sahana v. Ashish Kumar Sahana
06.09.2021
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Item No.3 CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION Ct.No.34 dc.
C.R.R. 1876 of 2016 (Via Video Conference) Archana Sahana versus Ashish Kumar Sahana In Re: An Application under Section 482 read with Sections 401/397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Mr. Masum Ali Sardar ... For the Petitioner.
The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that he has been freshly engaged in this matter and to that effect, a Vakalatnama has been submitted before this Court. Let the same be kept with the record.
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that he has been instructed by his client not to proceed with this revisional application.
In view of the submission, so advanced by the learned advocate for the petitioner, CRR 1876 of 2016 is dismissed as not pressed.
Let the written instruction given by the petitioner to her learned advocate-on-record be kept with the record. All pending applications, if any, are consequently disposed of.
Interim order, if any, is hereby vacated.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)