Hiranjay Das @ Hiranjay Chandra Das v. State Of West Bengal

15.07.2025 Ct.No.34 b.das Rejected C.R.M. (M) 742 of 2025 In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 filed in connection with Raiganj Police Station Case No.363 of 2025 dated 12.04.2025 under Section 103(1) of the BNS, 2023.

And In Re :Hiranjay Das @ Hiranjay Chandra Das ... Petitioner.

Mr. Kunal Ganguly ... for the petitioner.

Mr. Ranadeb Sengupta Ms. Madhumita Basak ... for the State.

Heard learned counsels for the parties.

The petitioner is in custody for more than 90 days and prays for bail.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the minor daughter of the petitioner died out of accidental burn injuries and the petitioner has no role to play therein. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer. I have considered the material on record. The petitioner's wife who is the de facto complainant has implicated the petitioner in her statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS. Trial is yet to commence. Offences, if proved, shall attract mandatory life imprisonment.

Considering the gravity of the offence and prima facie involvement of the petitioner therein, prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.

The application for bail is thus disposed of.

Case diary be returned.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)