Idil Sarkar And ANR. v. State Of West Bengal

22.07.2025 Ct. No.25 Sl No.7 Mujahid (Reject) CRM (A) 2071 of 2025 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S.

filed on 16.06.2025 in connection with Nakhashipara P.S. Case No. 437 of 2025 dated 02.05.2025 under Sections 115(2)/117(2)/118(2)/109/303(3)/3(5) of BNS, 2023.

And In the matter of : Idil Sarkar & Anr.

... Petitioners.

Mr. Avijit Ganguly ... for the petitioners Mr. Prabir Majumder, Ms. A. Kundu ...for the de facto complainant Mr. B.K. Roy, Ms. Soumya Basu Roy Chowdhury ... ... for the State 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the alleged incident occurred at about 4.30 p.m. and the FIR was lodged at about 9.00 p.m. Learned counsel submits that in fact there was previous enmities between the parties on account of which the present false case was registered against the petitioners. 2.

Learned counsel for the State has opposed the pre-arrest bail application. Learned counsel submits that the accused persons assaulted the injured with sharp edge weapon, on account of which he suffered injury at the scalp and had 5 stitches.

3.

The court has seen the injury report. The injured has specifically named the petitioners. The delay of 4 to 5 hours in

registering the complaint is quite natural as the first injured / victim went to hospital and got the treatment. 4.

Taking into account the facts and circumstances, the court considers that it is not a fit case for grant of pre-arrest bail, hence rejected.

5.

All parties shall act on the basis of the server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)