Jui Barman @ Jui Roy And ANR. v. State Of West Bengal

29.08.2025 Ct.No.25 Sl. No.5 Mujahid (Allowed) CRM (A) 2073 of 2025 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S.

filed on 16.06.2025 in connection with Gangarampur P.S. Case No.209/2025 dated 05.04.2025 under Sections 109(1)/117(2)/126(2)/351(2)/3(5) of B.N.S., 2023. And In the matter of: Jui Barman @ Jui Roy & Anr. ... Petitioners Mr. Mazhar Hossain Chowdhury, Ms. Chandrima Debnath, Ms. S. Sultanan ...for the petitioners Ms. Mousumi Sarkar ...for the State 1.

Learned counsel for the State has placed on record the English translated copy of the statement of victim Shila Roy. 2.

I have perused the statement, name of the petitioners appear in the statement. However, it indicates that weapon of offence was a wooden of piece (lathi), the injuries have been opined to be grievous in nature.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that co-accused Bharati Roy had already been admitted to anticipatory bail. The facts indicate that this is a dispute between the families. 4.

Taking into account facts and circumstances, let the petitioner be admitted to pre-arrest bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local. Subject to the further conditions that the petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer as and when

called and shall not threaten, tamper or intimidate the prosecution witnesses in any manner.

5.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. 6.

All parties shall act on the basis of the server copy of this order.

(Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)