Calcutta High CourtCPAN/1115/2002dismissed for default

Ram Murti v. Puspamoni Singhadeo

2022-07-01Hon'Ble Justice Sugato Majumdar1 pages

01.07.2022.

C.P.A.N. 1115 of 2002 Ram Murti Vs.

Puspamoni Singhadeo in WPA 16911 of 1997 Ram Murty Vs.

Union of India IA No. CAN/1/1997(Old No. CAN/7579/1999) IA No. CAN/2/1999(Old No. CAN/1292/1999) IA No. CAN/3/1999(Old No. CAN/8982/1999) IA No. CAN/4/2000(Old No. CAN/5911/2000) IA No. CAN/1/1997(Old No. CAN/7579/1999) IA No. CAN/2/1999(Old No. CAN/1292/1997) IA No. CAN/3/1999(Old No. CAN/8982/1999) IA No. CAN/4/2000(Old No. CAN/5911/2000) ab Ct. 40 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls.

No accommodation is sought for.

Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for default.

There shall be no order as to costs.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Sugato Majumdar, J.)