Rama Rani Banerjee v. Spandan Banerjee And ANR

16.08.2022 sayandeep Sl. No. 26 Ct. No. 07 CO 1811 of 2022 Rama Rani Banerjee -Versus- Spandan Banerjee & Anr.

Mr. Tapan Kumar.....

...... for the petitioner A direction to secure expeditious disposal of a suit being T.S. No. 433 of 2019 pending before the learned Civil Judge Senior Division 1st Court, Barasat is the ultimate relief sought for in this case.

Admittedly petitioner is the plaintiff mother, who has filed the instant suit, referred above, against her son with others praying for declaration that the deed allegedly executed by the mother, petitioner is inoperative, void and non-est.

The only contention expressed by the learned advocate for the petitioner is against the delay caused in the disposal of the suit.

No other point is raised requiring address by this Court.

In view of the nature of the order proposed to be made in this case, no prior notice is considered to be necessary upon the opposite party.

Service of notice of this application upon opposite party stands dispensed with.

Accordingly, the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), 1st Court, Barasat, in Title Suit No. 433 of 2019 is requested to ensure expeditious disposal of suit, after causing disposal of interlocutory application, if there be any pending, providing sufficient opportunity of hearing to either of the parties to this case, but without granting unnecessary adjournment, unless it is extremely unavoidable.

Petitioner is directed to make communication of this order to the learned court below as well as to the learned advocate appearing in the court below for the opposite party and the opposite party.

With this observation and direction, the revisional application stands disposed of.

Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on usual undertakings.

(Subhasis Dasgupta J.)