Calcutta High CourtCPAN/1309/2003dismissed for default

Ananda Paul v. Narayan Sarup Nigam

2022-12-01Hon'Ble Justice Rabindranath Samanta2 pages

01-12-2022 Item no.33 Subrata Bhattacharyya

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Special Jurisdiction Appellate Side CPAN No.1309 of 2003 Sri Ananda Paul -vsNarayan Sarup Nigam arising out of WPA No.11231 of 2003 To press the contempt application, none represents the petitioner.

The petitioner, by way of this contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India filed on August 29, 2003, sought for punishment of the alleged contemner/respondent concerned in the writ petition for non-compliance of an order dated July 1, 2003 passed by this court in WP No.11231(W) of 2003.

It appears that since filing of the contempt application, none moved to press it.

I feel that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand.

Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner. [Rabindranath Samanta, J]