Bhuban Mohan Ray v. Papu Mondal

19.5.2025 Sl.21 Nandita Court No.655 CRA 322 of 2010 In the matter of : Bhuban Mohan Ray ....Appellant

1. None appears on behalf of the appellant.

2. Respondent/accused is also not represented.

3. In pursuance of the direction passed by this Court earlier on 02.04.2025 a report is submitted by the ASI of Police of Jorasanko PS indicating that the notice could not be served upon the appellant. He contacted with the son of the appellant and on asking it was revealed that the said appellant Bhuban Mohan Ray has already been expired during the pendency of this appeal.

4. The instant appeal is preferred by the appellant challenging the judgment and order of acquittal dated 16.03.2010 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 6th Court, Calcutta in connection with case no. C-11356 of 2004 whereby the present respondent/accused is found not guilty for commission of offence punishable under Sections 323/341/506 of the Indian Penal Code.

5. I have gone through the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned Trial Court and I find there is nothing to interfere with the said judgment.

6. Accordingly, the present appeal de hors of merit and is liable to be dismissed.

7. The instant appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed on merit.

8. The impugned judgment and order of acquittal passed by the learned Trial Court dated 16.03.2010 passed in connection with case no. C-11356 of 2010 is hereby affirmed.

9. Let a copy of this order along with the Trial Court Record be sent down to the Trial Court immediately.

(Prasenjit Biswas, J.)