Satyabrata Hazra & ORS v. State Of West Bengal & ORS

26.07.2024 Ct. No.33 Sl. No.5 & 6 cm WPA 9914 of 2015 Dipak Kumar Bhattacharyya & Ors.

With State of West Bengal & Ors.

With WPA 11687 of 2015 Satyabrata Hazra & Ors.

With State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Dibyendu Chatterjee ... for the petitioners In WPA 9914 of 2015 Mr. Ujjal Ray ... for the petitioners in WPA 11687 of 2015 Mr. Satyajit Talukder Ms. Rutika Verma ... for the respondent Nos. 5 & 6/KMDA In Re: WPA 9914 of 2015 Mr. Dibyendu Chatterjee, learned advocate for the petitioners submits to have filed vakalatnama in the Department in order to represent the petitioners. Pursuant to the receipt of the administrative notice, the petitioners are present in Court today. Their personal appearance is noted and dispensed with.

The learned advocate for the petitioners has filed two distinct written instructions dated 25.07.2024 stated that they do not want to proceed with the hearing of the instant writ petition. Let the said written instruction be kept record.

The learned advocate for the respondent Nos. 2 and 5 is present.

The affidavit-in-opposition filed on behalf of the respondent Nos. 2 to 5 be kept on record.

Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.

In Re: WPA 11687 of 2015 Pursuant to the receipt of the administrative notice, the petitioners are present in Court today. Their personal appearance is noted and dispensed with.

Mr. Ujjal Ray, learned advocate for the petitioners submits to have filed vakalatnama in the Department in order to represent the petitioners.

The learned advocate for the petitioners has filed a written instruction dated 25.07.2024 stated that they do not want to proceed with the hearing of the instant writ petition. Let the said written instruction be kept record. The learned advocate for the respondent Nos. 2 and 5 is present.

Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.

(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)