Nabab Sharif v. State Of West Bengal

16.12.2021.

46.

as (Allowed).

C.R.M. 6105 of 2021 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Chanchal P. S. Case No.717 of 2020 dated 21.08.2020 under Sections 448/323/325/307/326/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

In the matter of : Nabab Sharif.

... Petitioner.

Mr. Kazi M. Rahman.

...for the Petitioner.

Mr. Narayan Prasad Agarwal, Ms. Subhasree Patel.

.....for the State.

Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been falsely implicated in the instant case. Investigation is complete.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

We have considered the materials on record including the injury report. Whether the injury is grievous or not may be assessed in the light of attending facts and circumstances of the case during trial. However, in the aforesaid factual backdrop and as investigation is complete, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, to the

satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the trial court and pray for regular bail within a period of four weeks from date. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Bivas Pattanayak,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)