Anarul Sk @ Mollick And ORS v. State Of West Bengal

07.07.2022 Serial no.35 Aloke CRM (A) 3212 of 2022 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Palashipara Police Station Case No. 226 of 2022 dated 25.06.2022 under Sections 498A/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. -AndIn the matter of : Anarul Sk @ Mollick & Ors. ... ... Petitioners Mr. Asraf Mandal, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioners Mr. Debabrata Chatterjee, Advocate Mr. Pratik Bose, Advocate Mr. Santanu Chatterjee, Advocate ... ...For the State Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the husband was arrested and is in custody. The petitioners were falsely implicated.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention to the injury report of the victim as also to the complaint lodged by the victim.

Apparently, there was an attempt to strangulate the victim. This inference can be drawn from the injury report of the victim.

The complaint of the victim paints an alarming picture. It implicates the petitioners.

In such circumstances, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected. CRM (A) 3212 of 2022 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)