Moni Manjusha Nandy v. Prabir Kumar Nag And ANR

Court No. 6 CO 2260 of 2025 (265719) 30.06.2025 Moni Manjusha Nandy Vs.

Prabir Kumar Nag & Anr.

(AD 53) (S. Banerjee) Mr. Radha Nath Nandy ... the petitioner-in-person After some arguments, the petitioner appearing in-person submits that a direction be passed upon the learned Judge, 13th Bench, City Civil Court at Calcutta to dispose of Title Suit No. 908 of 2012 expeditiously.

In view of the order sought and proposed to be passed, there is no necessity to direct issuance of any notice upon the opposite parties. However, the petitioner in-person shall be obliged to forward a copy of this application along with this order, upon the opposite parties or upon the learned advocate representing the opposite parties before the learned trial judge.

From the order dated March 17, 2025 this court finds that an application under Order 6 Rule 17 of the cpc and an application under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code are pending.

It further appears that April 25, 2025 was fixed for cross-examination of the PW-1 on recall.

The petitioner appearing in-person submits that July 17, 2025 has been fixed for cross-examination of PW-1 on recall.

The learned Judge, 13th Bench, City Civil Court at Calcutta is requested to make an endeavour to dispose of Title Suit No. 908 of 2012 as expeditiously as possible, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties keeping in mind that the suit is pending from the year 2012.

(Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)