Minati Chakravorty v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.
06.08.2025 Ct.18 adeb W.P.A. 14102 of 2025 Minati Chakravorty -vsThe State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Lalratan Mondal Mr. Dilip Kumar Sadhu ....for the petitioner.
Md. Farhauddin ....for the State.
1. Affidavit-of-service filed by the petitioner is taken on record.
2. Petitioner is a retired Laboratory Attendant who superannuated on 31st July, 2002 and got the benefit under the Contributory Provident Fund Scheme (CPF).
Subsequently, petitioner exercised option to come under the Pensioncum-Gratuity Scheme in terms of Government notification dated 13th June, 2014 which was issued in terms of the judgment of the Special Bench dated 16th July, 2013 passed on intra court appeal being APO No.94 of 2009 (State of West Bengal & Ors. -vs- Abhijit Baidya & Ors.).
3. It has also been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that as per demand of the State respondents petitioner has deposited amount along with interest and additional interest which petitioner received under CPF
Scheme.
4. However, the grievance of the petitioner is after taking steps in terms of the said notification dated 13th June, 2014 by issuing pension payment order dated 25th August, pensionary benefit was sanctioned in favour of the petitioner not from the date following the date of petitioner's retirement but from the date of refund which petitioner made after exercising option in terms of the said notification dated 13th June, 2014. Petitioner claims issuance of revised pension payment order thereby sanctioning pensionary benefits from the date following date of petitioner's superannuation based on the judgment of the Special Bench dated 30th September, 2019 passed on intra Court appeal being APO No.121 of 2007.
5. The State respondents are represented by learned advocates who has also submitted that based on the judgment dated 30th September, 2019 of the Special Bench the benefit of pension is accorded to other similarly circumstanced retired teachers from the date following the date of their superannuation provided exercise of option has been made within time in terms of said notification dated
13th June, 2014 and if the refund is made by the concerned teacher as per the calculation of the State respondents.
6. This Court has perused the writ petition and heard the learned advocates representing the parties.
7. It appears that the petitioner did exercise option within time in terms of the said notification dated 13th June, 2014 and the petitioner on duly exercising option in terms of notification dated 13th June, 2014 switched over from CPF to Pension-cum-Gratuity Scheme. On placing reliance on paragraph 55 of the judgment of the Special Bench dated 30th September, 2019, this Court does not find any impediment in extending benefit of pension to petitioner from the date following the date of petitioner's retirement provided exercise of option is made within time and refund has been made as per the calculation of the State respondents.
8. Accordingly, this Court directs the State respondents to issue revised pension payment order in favour of the petitioner within twelve weeks from the date of communication of this order thereby extending the benefit of pension from the date following the date of petitioner's
superannuation.
9. With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.
10.
However, there shall be no order as to costs.
11.
Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings.
(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)