Sebak Goswami v. State Of West Bengal

08.07.2022 Serial no.21 Aloke CRM (A) 3227 of 2022 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Kharagpur Local Police Station Case No.451 of 2022 dated 07.06.2022 under Sections 498A/323/307/406/342/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 3/4 of the D.P. Act.

-AndIn the matter of : Sebak Ghoswami ... ... Petitioner Mr. S. Bhattacharyya, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. Arijit Ganguly, Advocate Mr. Nirupam Dhali, Advocate ... ...For the State Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the police complaint was lodged 11 years after marriage. The mother-in-law was enlarged on bail by the jurisdictional Court.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention to the injury report of the victim and the statement of the servant of the house as also the neighbour's statement recorded under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The person said to be the servant of the house in a statement recorded under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure squarely implicates the petitioner. In such circumstances, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. CRM (A) 3227 of 2022 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)