Calcutta High CourtCPAN/806/2006dismissed for default

Padam Kr. Jain v. Alapan Bandhopadhyay

2022-08-22Hon'Ble Justice Sugato Majumdar1 pages

22.08.2022.

C.P.A.N. 806 of 2006 in WPA 9276 of 2005 Padam Kr. Jain Vs. Alapan Bandhopadhyay No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on ab Ct. 40 repeated calls.

No accommodation is sought for.

Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for default.

There shall be no order as to costs.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Sugato Majumdar, J.)