Md Tahajuddin @ Mir Tahajuddin v. State Of West Bengal

11.07.2022 Serial no.34 Aloke CRM (A) 3284 of 2022 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Manikchak Police Station Case No. 254 of 2022 dated 31.05.2022 under Sections 498A/326/307 of the Indian Penal Code. -AndIn the matter of : Md. Tahajuddin @ Mir Tahajuddin ... ... Petitioner Mr. Kalidas Saha, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. Bidyut Kr. Roy, Advocate Ms. Sima Biswas, Advocate ... ...For the State Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was falsely implicated.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention to the injury report of the victim. She submits that the de facto complainant suffered injury of fracture. Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner therein as transpiring from the materials in the case diary, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. CRM (A) 3284 of 2022 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)