Toufik Sk @ Towfik Sk v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

16.07.2025 Sl. No.21 Ct. 28 NB C.R.M. (A) 2223 of 2025 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kaliachak P.S. Case No.1048 of 2024 dated 12.07.2024 under Section 363/365 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the POCSO Act.

And In the matter of : Toufik Sk. @ Towfik Sk.

... petitioner Mr. Tapan Dutta Gupta, Mr. Parvej Anam, Ms. Rituparna Ghosh.

...for the petitioner.

Mr. Madhusudan Sur ld.APP., Mr. Nirupam Dhali.

...for the State.

Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.

No one appears on behalf of the de facto complainant. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the case diary.

Considering the incriminating materials available in the case diary including the statement of the 14 years old victim recorded before the learned Magistrate, I do not consider this to be a fit case for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The application for anticipatory bail being C.R.M. (A) 2223 of 2025 is, thus, rejected.

Urgent photostat certified copies of this order may be delivered to the learned Advocates for the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all formalities.

(Jay Sengupta, J.)