← Library
Calcutta High CourtFAT/310/2016allowed

Sail (Isp), Burnpur, Sail, Iisco Steel Plant, Burnpur v. Biswanath Mahji & ANR

2025-06-19Hon'Ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,Hon'Ble Justice Uday Kumar3 pages

AD- 02-11 12.06.2025 (AK) FAT/310/2016 IA No: CAN 3 of 2025 SAIL (ISP), BURNPUR, SAIL, IISCO STEEL PLANT, BURNPUR VS BISWANATH MAHJI & ANR With FAT/157/2019 IA No: CAN 1 of 2025 SAIL (ISP) BURNPUR STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD.

VS LAKSHMAN CH. MAJHI & ANR.

with FAT/158/2019 IA No: CAN 1 of 2025 SR. MGR., ESTATE STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD.

VS KAPIL MAJI @ KAPIL CH. MAJHI & ANR.

with FAT/161/2019 IA No: IA No: CAN 1 of 2019 (Old No: CAN 4004 of 2019) CAN 2 of 2025 D.GM. SAIL VS JIBANKRISHAN MAJI & ANR.

with FAT/206/2017 IA No: CAN 3 of 2025 SAIL(ISP), BURNPUR, STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED, IISCO VS BISWANATH MAJHI & ANR with FAT/496/2016 IA No: CAN 3 of 2025 SAIL (ISP) BURNPUR, IISCO STEEL PLANT BURNPUR VS AMAR MAJHI & ANR with FAT/497/2016 IA No: CAN 3 of 2025 SAIL (ISP) BURNPUR, STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD VS GOBINDA DULAL MONDAL & ANR

with FAT/513/2016 IA No: CAN 3 of 2025 SAIL (ISP),BURNPUR,STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD.

VS KRIPA SINDHU MAJHI & ANR with FAT/514/2016 IA No: CAN 3 of 2025 SAIL (ISP),BURNPUR, STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD.

VS AUROBINDA MAJI & ANR with FAT/538/2016 IA No: CAN 3 of 2025 SAIL (ISP), BURNPUR, SAIL, IISCO STEEL PLANT, BURNPUR VS SANTIRANJAN MAJHI & ANR Mr. Lakshmi Kumar Gupta, Mr. Kallol Bose, Mr. Nilanjan Pal, Mr. Bandhu Brata Bhula, ...For the Appellant in Item Nos. 2 to 10.

Mr. Partha Pratim Roy, Ms. Shahina Haque, Ms. Poulami Chakraborty, .....For the Respondents in Item Nos. 6 & 11. Mr. T. M. Siddiqui, Mr. Suddhadev Adak ...For the State Respondent in item No. 6.

Mr. Nilotpal Chatterjee, Jr. Govt. Adv.

Mr. Amrita Lal Chatterjee .....For the State in Item No. 7.

Mr. Sk. Md. Galib, Sr. Govt. Advocate Mr. Manish Biswas ....For the State in Item No.8.

Mr. Nirmalya Ray ...for the respondent no.1 in item no.8.

Mr. Supratim Dhar Ms. Tuli Sinha ....For the State in Item No.11.

1.

Hearing is concluded.

2.

The matter is reserved for judgment.

(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.) (Uday Kumar, J.)