Sumit Kumar Shaw And ANR v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

C.R.R.2276 of 2023 D/L4 27.06.2023 Bpg.

In Re: An application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973;

Sumit Kumar Shaw and another

Versus

State of West Bengal and another Mr. Faiyaz Ahmed Khan Mr. Rishabh Ahmad Khan.

...for the petitioners.

Mr. Rudradipta Nandy Ms. Debjani Sahu.

...for the State.

Mr. Dilip Kumar Mukherjee Mr. Lord Chatterjee.

...for the de facto complainant/opposite party no.2. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners do not intend to proceed with the present revisional application. Mr. Nandy, learned advocate, appears on behalf of the State along with the case diary.

Mr. Mukherjee, learned advocate, appears on behalf of the de facto complainant/opposite party no.2. Having regard to the submissions advanced by the learned advocate for the petitioners, CRR 2276 of 2023 is dismissed as not pressed.

Pending application, if any, is consequently disposed of. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)