Md Mainul Hoque v. The State Of West Bengal And ANR.

19.08.2024 SL No.1 Court No.29 (b.das) CRM (A) 2030 of 2024 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of : Md. Mainul Hoque.

- Petitioner.

Mr. Sekhar Basu, Sr. Adv.

...Amicus Curiae.

Md. Wasim Akram, ....For the Petitioner.

Mr. Suman De, Ms. Sudeshna Das ... For the State. Mr. Arnab Saha Mr. Abhimanyu Banerjee Mr. Anirban Basak ...for the de facto complainant.

1. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. Mr. Arnab Saha has appeared on behalf of the de facto complainant. In view of such appearance letter of engagement in favour of Ms. Suchismita Dutta, learned advocate appointed by the Calcutta High Court Legal Services Committee stands withdrawn.

3.

The matter is made CAV.

4. The original Case Diary is kept with the record. 5.

No coercive step shall be taken against the petitioner in the meantime.

6. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Soumen Sen, J.)

(Uday Kumar, J.)