Calcutta High CourtCO/1733/2021dismissed for default

Raktima Mukherjee v. Krishanu Ghosal

2022-08-18Hon'Ble Justice Rabindranath Samanta2 pages

18-08-2022 Item no.124 Subrata

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Civil Revisional Jurisdiction CO. No.1733 of 2021 Smt. Raktima Mukherjee Ghosal -vsSri Krishanu Ghosal with CAN No. 1 of 2022 None ...for the petitioner Mr. Bikram Banerjee Mr. Arka Nandi Mr. Sutirtha Nayak ...for the opposite party None appears to press the revisional application while the opposite party is represented.

I have heard learned counsel for the opposite party. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to proceed with the revisional application.

Accordingly, the s.24 CPC application is dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner.

Consequently, the connected application - CAN No.1 of 2022 - is disposed of.

[Rabindranath Samanta, J]