Santu Hazra And ORS v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

06.01.2022 Item No. 02 Crt.No.11 b.r. MAT 1083 of 2021 with IA No. CAN 1 of 2021 Santu Hazra & Ors.

-vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors.

(Via video conference) Mr. Debabrata Saha Roy Mr. Lakshminath Bhattacharya ...... for the appellants.

Mr. Jahar Lal De ....... For the State.

Mr. Debabrata Saha Roy, Learned Counsel, with Mr.

Lakshminath Bhattacharya, Learned Advocate, appears on behalf of appellants.

Mr. Jahar Lal De, Learned Advocate, appears on behalf of the State-Respondents.

This is an appeal against the order passed by the Hon'ble Single Bench in WPA 9223 of 2021 dated 17th of August, 2021.

The appellants submit that they have participated in the training duly conducted under the National Apprenticeship Training Scheme, Ministry of Human Resource Development and, on completion of their Apprentice Training they have been provided with the Certificates.

The appellants submit that as they have completed the training but no steps was taken for their placement in terms of Clause 10 of the order dated 05.10.2016 issued

by the Commissioner, Government of West Bengal, Department of Agriculture, Training Branch. As the candidature of the appellants were not considered, the appellants have filed the writ petition before the Hon'ble Single Judge. The Hon'ble Single Bench has dismissed the writ petition on the ground that the appellants have no right to claim for a mandatory order for appointment invoking the provisions of Clause 14 of the order dated 5th October, 2016.

This Court also considered the Clause 10 and Clause 14 of the order dated 05.10.2016 in which it is only provides to impart training of different extension work under Agriculture and allied subjects to the Apprentices.

This Court also has considered the submissions of the learned Counsel for the appellants, the order passed by the Hon'ble Single Judge and documents available on record.

This Court finds that the State Government had not given any assurance to the appellants for placement of the appellant on completion of training.

The Hon'ble Single Judge has rightly held that the appellants have no right to claim the mandatory order of appointment on the ground of completion of their training.

In view of the above, this Court finds that there is no illegality in the order passed by the Hon'ble Single Judge and there is no reason to interfere with the order passed by the Hon'ble Single Judge.

Accordingly, MAT 1083 of 2021 along with IA No. CAN 1 of 2021 stand dismissed.

All parties shall act in terms of the copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all necessary formalities.

(Krishna Rao, J.) (Subrata Talukdar, J.)