Dilip Ku,Ar Basu v. Ujjal Kumar Das

02.09.

C.O. 1955 of 2022 ML AGM Ct Dilip Kumar Basu Vs Ujjal Kumar Das Mr. Rabindra Kumar Jaiswal, ... For the petitioner.

A direction to secure expeditious disposal of a suit being Ejectment Suit No. 9 of 2016, is the ultimate relief sought for in this case.

The only contention expressed by the learned advocate for the petitioner is against the delay caused in the disposal of the suit.

As per submission disclosed by the petitioner, the defendant is a senior citizen, who already filed an interlocutory application, praying for framing additional issue, as disclosed in the petition filed by the petitioner under Order 14 read with Section 151 of the CPC, dated 26.07.2019.

No other point is raised requiring address by this Court.

In view of the nature of the order proposed to be made in this case, no prior notice is considered to be necessary upon the opposite party.

Service of notice of this application upon opposite party stands dispensed with.

Accordingly, the Civil Judge (Junior Division), 2nd Court, Alipore, in Ejectment Suit No. 9 of 2016 is

requested to ensure expeditious disposal of the suit after causing disposal of the interlocutory application referred hereinabove, providing sufficient opportunity of hearing to either of the parties to this case, but without granting unnecessary adjournments, unless it is extremely unavoidable.

Petitioner is directed to make communication of this order to the learned court below as well as to the learned advocate appearing in the court below for the opposite party and the opposite party.

With this observation and direction, the revisional application stands disposed of.

Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on usual undertakings.

(Subhasis Dasgupta, J)