Sunidhi Finvest Limited v. Mukesh Kumar Agarwal And ORS

AKG 09-12-2021 C.O. 1750 of 2021 Sunidhi Finvest Limited Ct.21

Versus

Sri Mukesh Kumar Agarwal & Ors.

(VIA VIDEO CONFERENCE) Mr. Subhankar Chakraborty, Mr. Saptarshi Bhattacharjee ...for the Petitioner The petitioner serves affidavit of service along with postal receipt and track report showing due service. The petitioner by filing the present revisional application has prayed for expeditious disposal of all the interlocutory applications pending in Title Appeal No. 124 of 2019 in the Court of the learned District Judge, Alipore.

It has been contended that the learned District Judge at Alipore by granting adjournment has failed to exercise jurisdiction vested in it and caused delay in the hearing of the appeal.

The learned District Judge, Alipore is requested to see that all interlocutory applications pending in Title Appeal No 124 of 2019 are dispose of at the earliest but giving regards to the diary maintained by him/her. Since the petitioner has prayed for expeditious disposal of interlocutory applications pending in Title Appeal No 124 of 2019, there is no possibility of causing any prejudice to the opposite parties.

Further having regard to the nature of relief claimed, I see no reason to put the opposite parties on notice. Service of notice on the opposite parties is dispensed with.

Accordingly, C.O. No. 1750 of 2021 is hereby disposed of.

There will be no order as to costs.

Urgent Photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

All parties are directed to act on a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Kesang Doma Bhutia, J.)