Sakila Bibi Sekh And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

C.R.M. (A) 3376 of 2022 15.07.2022 Sl. 21 Court No.29 (AD) (Rejected) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Dhantala Police Station Case No.448 of 2022 dated 21/06/2022 under Sections 498A/326/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. And In the matter of: Sakila Bibi Sekh & Anr.

....petitioners.

Mr. Arka Tilak Bhadra ...for the petitioners.

Mr. Imran Ali Mr. M.F.A. Begg Ms. Debjani Sahu ...for the State.

Petitioners pray for anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were falsely implicated. Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the injury report of the victim and to the complaint lodged by the victim.

In her complaint, the victim implicates both the petitioners. The victim suffered grievous hurt. In such circumstances, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the

petitioners is rejected.

C.R.M. (A) 3376 of 2022 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)