Bablu Karmakar v. Dibyen Mukherjee

30.06.2022.

C.P.A.N. 584 of 2008 Bablu Karmakar Vs.

Dibyen Mukherjee in WPA 1389 of 2007 Bablu Karmakar Vs.

State ab Ct. 40 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls.

No accommodation is sought for.

Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for default.

There shall be no order as to costs.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Sugato Majumdar, J.)