Uttam Dome v. State Of West Bengal

C.R.M. (A) 3371 of 2022 15.07.2022 Sl. 16 Court No.29 (AD) (Rejected) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Panrui Police Station Case No.65 of 2022 dated 06/05/2022 under Sections 447/325/326/307/354B/427/504/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

And In the matter of: Uttam Dome ....petitioner.

Mr. Sujoy Sarkar ...for the petitioner.

Mr. Sanjoy Bardhan Ms. Mausumi Sarkar ...for the State.

Petitioner prays for anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that other co-accuseds were enlarged on bail by this Hon'ble Court.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the injury report of the victim and to the statements of the victim as also the injured recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The injured implicates the petitioner in the statement recorded under Section 164.

Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement

of the petitioner therein as transpiring from the materials in the case diary, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.

C.R.M. (A) 3371 of 2022 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)