← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/3373/2022allowed

Subhash Kaybartta v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

2022-07-18Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Bibhas Ranjan De3 pages

18.07.2022 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M.(A) 3373 of 2022 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Bishnupur Police Station Case No. 310 of 2022 dated 09.05.2022 under Sections 376/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

And In Re : Subhash Kaybartta ...... petitioner Mr. Arindam Jana Mr. Arhan Sengupta ....for the petitioner Mr. Bidyut Kumar Roy Ms. Rita Dutta ....for the State Petitioner prays for anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, the police complaint was registered pursuant to an order passed under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal procedure (Cr.P.C.). The petitioner lent and advanced money to the defacto complainant. When the petitioner demanded the refund of the money, the police case was lodged.

Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the Statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal procedure (Cr.P.C.). The 164 Cr.P.C. statement of the victim speaks of the money transaction.

In view of the materials in the case diary and in view of the statement of the victim, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer as and when called for till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)