Md Hasanuzzeman v. State Of West Bengal

30.09.2021 Ct. No. 29 sdas Allowed C.R.M. 6496 of 2021 (via video conference) In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Ratua Police Station Case No. 39 of 2021 dated 22.01.2021 under Sections 448/376/325/506 of the Indian Penal Code. And In Re : Md. Hasanuzzeman ...... petitioner Mr. Tapan Datta Gupta Mr. Parvej Anam .....for the petitioner Mr. Sandip Chakraborty ....for the State The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was falsely implicated in the instant case. Police complaint is a counter blast to the petitioner lending money to the husband of the de facto complainant. Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the statement recorded under Section 164 of the victim lady. In answer to the query of the Court he submits that the victim lady refused medical. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that there is no medical report and

considering that the complaint was lodged after 27 days from the date of the incident, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further conditions that the petitioner shall meet the investigating officer once in a fortnight until further orders and shall appear before the jurisdictional court and pray for regular bail within a period of four weeks from date.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Ananda Kumar Mukherjee, J.)