Anarul Alam Mondal v. State Of West Bengal

10.12.2021 sdas rejected C.R.M. 6541 of 2021 (via video conferencing) In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Joynagar Police Station Case No. 73 of 2021 dated 07.02.2021 under Sections 448/302/325/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In Re : Anarul Alam Mondal ..... petitioner Mr. Tapan Kumar Mahapatra ... for the petitioner Mr. Neguive Ahmed, learned APP Ms. Sujata Das ... for the State It is submitted by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner that he is in custody for eleven months. He has been falsely implicated in the instant case.

Learned Counsel appearing for the State opposes prayer for bail.

We have considered materials on record. Statements of witnesses show that the petitioner and accused persons armed with deadly weapons entered into the house of the deceased and assaulted him resulting in his death.

In view of the gravity of the offence and the prima facie involvement of the petitioner therein, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

The application for bail is, thus, rejected. (Bivas Pattanayak, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

C.R.M. 192 of 2018 In Re.: An application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 05.01.2018 in connection with Karimpur Police Station Case No. 136 of 2012 dated 03.07.2012 under Sections 420/467/468/471/120B of the Indian Penal Code. And In Re : Rabish Kumar Upadhyay ..... petitioner Mr. Asraf Ali ... for the petitioner Mr. Debojyoti Deb ... for the State Having considered the materials on record prima facie disclosing involvement of the petitioner in the alleged crime of misappropriation of monies of the innocent depositors and the fact that the petitioner has absconded for a protracted period of time, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.

The application for bail is, thus, rejected. (Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)