← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (DB)/1994/2024rejected

Alima Khatun @ Basona Bibi @ Alima Bibi v. The State Of West Bengal

2024-07-10Hon'Ble Justice Arijit Banerjee,Hon'Ble Justice Apurba Sinha Ray2 pages

10.07.2024 Item no. 41.

Court No.28.

AB (Rejected) CRM (DB) 1994 of 2024 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Bhagwangola P.S. Case No.571 of 2023 dated 24.11.23 under Sections 498A/326/307 34/302 of the Indian Penal Code And In the matter of : Alima Khatun @ Basona Bibi @ Alima Bibi ......Petitioner.

Mr. Navanil De, Mr. Subhrajit Dey, Ms. Monami Mukherjee ......for the Petitioner.

Mr. Ranadeb Sengupta Mr. Akash Ganguly ......for the State.

Md. Bani Israil ....for the Defacto complainant.

Prima facie, there is very strong evidence against this petitioner. She is the sister in law of the victim lady, who, according to the dying declaration, was set on fire by her husband and this petitioner after she was doused with kerosene. The petitioner says that she is in custody for seven months. She has two young children. Charge sheet has been filed. Two accused persons have already been granted bail/anticipatory bail. She should be granted bail. Learned Advocate for the State strongly opposes the prayer for bail. He says that there is enough prima facie indication of the petitioner's involvement in the crime, which is of a heinous nature.

Signed By :

APURBA BANDYOPADHYAY High Court of Calcutta 11 th of July 2024 11:35:26 AM

On going through the material in the Case Diary, we find prima facie involvement of the petitioner in the alleged offence.

Hence, we are not inclined to entertain the petitioner's prayer for bail, at this stage.

The prayer for bail is, accordingly, rejected. CRM (DB) 1994 of 2024 is dismissed.

All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Arijit Banerjee, J.) (Apurba Sinha Ray, J.)