Himanshu Kayal v. State Of West Bengal & ORS

22.01.

WPA 14375 of 2014 Himanshu Kayal Ct. No.

Vs.

State of West Bengal and others Ab --------------- Mr. Ritwik Bose.

... for the petitioner.

1.

At the time of hearing, Mr. Bose, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner, has filed a written instruction dated September 4, 2025 before this Court whereby a request has been made to the learned Advocate-onRecord of the writ petitioner to withdraw the instant writ petition. Such written instruction is kept with the record.

2.

It is, thus, submitted by Mr. Bose that appropriate order may be passed in terms of the writing dated September 4, 2025 as issued by the writ petitioner.

3.

Perused the writing dated September 4, 2025 filed today. Heard the learned Advocate for the writ petitioner.

4.

In view of the submission made on behalf of the writ petitioner, WPA 14375 of 2014 stands withdrawn and disposed of.

5.

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

6.

There shall, however, be no order as to

costs.

(Partha Sarathi Sen, J.)