Sk. Aynul Haque v. Pritish Pathak

01.07.2022.

C.P.A.N. 1389 of 2001 Sk. Aynul Haque Vs.

Pritish Pathak in WPA 5160 of 1997 Sk. Aynul Haque Vs.

The State ab Ct. 40 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls.

No accommodation is sought for.

Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for default.

There shall be no order as to costs.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Sugato Majumdar, J.)