← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/2143/2024allowed

Aneshur Rahaman @ Mahammad Anisur Rahaman @ Md. Anisur Rahaman And ORS v. The State Of West Bengal

2024-07-05Hon'Ble Justice Soumen Sen,Hon'Ble Justice Uday Kumar2 pages

05.07.2024 Court No.29 Item No. 21 Allowed ar CRM (A) 2143 of 2024 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Harishchandrapur Police Station Case No. 302 of 2024 dated 13.04.2024 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 930 of 2024 under Sections 448/325/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 3/4 of the Explosive Substances Act.

And In Re: Aneshur Rahaman @ Mahammad Anisur Rahaman @ Md. Anisur Rahaman & Ors.

Petitioners Mr. B. Bhattacharya Mr. S. Pakrashi For the Petitioners Mr. Pravash Bhattacharya Mr. Akash Ganguly For the State

1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

2. Considering the materials available in the case diary and the nature and extent of the petitioners in the commission of the alleged offence and having regard to the fact that the principal accused has been enlarged on bail, we are of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not necessary.

3. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners, namely, Aneshur Rahaman @ Mahammad Anisur Rahaman @ Md. Anisur Rahaman, Abdul Rahim Zaohar @ Abdur Rohim Jowhar @ Abdul Rohim Jawhar, Safikul Islam and Bablu @ Bablu Alam shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, subject to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also to comply with the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Signed By :

AMITAVA ROY High Court of Calcutta 5 th of July 2024 05:59:55 PM

Procedure, 1973. The petitioners shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a week or as and when called for till the submission of the final report and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chanchal, Malda two weeks from date in connection with G.R. Case No. 930 of 2024. In the event of non-compliance of any of the conditions, the anticipatory bail shall stand automatically cancelled without any further reference to this Court.

4. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed and the same is accordingly disposed of.

5. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Soumen Sen, J) (Uday Kumar , J) Signed By :

AMITAVA ROY High Court of Calcutta 5 th of July 2024 05:59:55 PM