Taheba Begum v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

06.01.2025 Serial no.27 Aloke Ct. No. 30 CRR 2040 of 2021 Taheba Bagum Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Manas Kr. Das Mr. Monojit Chatterjee Mr. Aritra Kr. Thakdar ... for the petitioner Ms. Rita Datta ... for the State Affidavit-of-service filed be kept with the record. In spite of due service there in no representation on behalf of the opposite parties.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner in full. Ms. Rita Datta, learned empanneled counsel of the State present in Court is appointed to represent the State of West Bengal in this case. Let her appointment be regularized by the appropriate authorities.

The present revisional application has been preferred against the order dated March 8, 2021 passed in M.P. Case No. 56 of 2021 by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Uluberia, Howrah thereby rejecting the petition of complaint under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner praying for conducting an investigation of the said complaint by the Police treating the same as First Information Report. The order under revision is as follows :

"Today is fixed for report.

Received a report from SI Surajit Sarkar of Rajapur P.S. that over the complaint of the complainant namely Taheba Begum against Sk. Saifuddin @ Sk. Saifuddin & 07 ors. Perused the report.

It appears from the report that "in order to keep the family members of Sk. Saifuddin under pressure and to get relief from above noted case the petitioner Taheba Begum have submitted this complaint. No complain regarding stealing of goods has submitted by the petitioner. So no case has registered at Rajapur P.S. over the complaint of petitioner namely Taheba Begum

(24) W/O Sk. Sariful Ali of Vill-Baragram, PO-Dulopur, P.S. Rajapur, Dist-Howrah".

Hence, in view of the report this court finds no need to initiated criminal case against the accused over the said complaint.

Therefore, let the present misc. petition be dropped. Inform.

............................"

It appears from the said order that the learned Magistrate has duly considered the police report and has applied her judicial mind and dismissed the application under Section 156(3) in accordance with law.

This Court finds no irregularity in the said order under revision and finds no ground to interfere with the same. The present revisoinal application is thus dismissed. There will be no order as to costs.

All connected applications, if any, stand disposed of. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties expeditiously after due compliance. (Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.)