Bahadur Mia v. State Of West Bengal
19.07.2022 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M.(A) 3435 of 2022 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Kaliachak Police Station Case No. 1005 of 2021 dated 17.09.2021 under Sections 21(c)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
And In Re : Bahadur Mia ...... petitioner Mr. Kalidas Saha ....for the petitioner Mr. Swapan Banerjee Mr. Suman De ....for the State Petitioner prays for anticipatory bail.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, the police filed charge-sheet. No narcotic was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is sought to be proceeded against on the basis of the statement of the coaccused made while in custody. Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the materials in the case diary. At the present stage, the police are unable to establish any nexus between the petitioner and the person arrested with commercial quantity of narcotic or the seized commercial
quantity of narcotic. No narcotic was recovered from the possession of the petitioner.
In such circumstances, we are of the view that the petitioner is able to overcome the restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, 1985. Consequently, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.
This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)