← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/2388/2025rejected

Chaitanya Mandal v. The State Of West Bengal

2025-07-30Hon'Ble Justice Jay Sengupta1 pages

30/07/2025 D/L 59 Ct. No.28 S.Kundu C.R.M.(A) 2388 of 2025 Rejected In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In connection with Mothabari police station case no. 61 of dated 9.2.2024 under sections 341/326/325/307/506/34 of the IPC.

In the matter of: Chaitanya Mandal ... Petitioner Ms. Sabrina Parveen ...for the petitioner.

Mr. Ranadeb Sengupta Ms. P. Bose ...for the State.

1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that there are case and counter case. The petitioner also suffered injuries.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State relies on the statements of witnesses and the injury report which shows inflicting of grievous injury.

3. Considering the incriminating materials available in the case diary including the injury report and the alleged role ascribed to the petitioner, I do not consider this to be a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected.

(Jay Sengupta, J.)