← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/3454/2022allowed

Chandana Bari And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

2022-07-25Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Bibhas Ranjan De2 pages

July 25, 2022

(52) ARDR Allowed CRM (A) 3454 of 2022 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Behala Police Station Case No. 52 of 2022 dated 02/03/2022 under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In the matter of: Chandana Bari & anr.

....petitioners.

Mr. Naba Kumar Das, Mr. Arindam Banerjee, ...for the petitioners.

Mr. Pravas Bhattacharya, Ms. Subhasree Patel, ...for the State.

Petitioners pray for anticipatory bail.

Considering the fact that the husband of the de facto complainant who is in custody and considering the fact that the case diary suggests for seizure of Stridhan articles, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the

jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed.

C.R.M. (A) 3454 of 2022 is thus, disposed of. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)