Aswini Das v. The State Of West Bengal And ORS.

S/L 6 24.07.2025 Court. No. 19 Suvayan WPA 15500 of 2025 Aswini Das Vs.

State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Prantik Garai Ms. Mou Saha Mr. Kumarjit Das ...for the petitioner.

Mr. Chandi Charan De, AGP Mr. Chittaranjan Ghosh ...for the State.

1. The writ petitioner and the respondents/State and its instrumentalities are represented by their respective Counsels.

2. On careful consideration of the entire materials as placed before this Court and after hearing the learned Advocates for the contending parties it reveals that it is the case of the writ petitioner that in respect of the property, particulars of which has been mentioned in page no. 68 of the instant writ petition the writ petitioner was granted a short term lease for a specified period. It is the further case of the writ petitioner that the said period of lease has already been expired and the writ petitioner is still in possession of the same. It is the further case of the writ petitioner that immediately after expiry of the said short term lease deed the writ petitioner is constantly approaching the respondents/authorities for grant of long term lease in respect of the said property.

3. It is the grievance of the writ petitioner that despite submission of several representations the

respondents/authorities sat tight over the matter and are practically doing nothing.

4. Mr. De, learned AGP appearing on behalf of the respondents/State and its instrumentalities, however, in his usual fairness submits before this Court that the respondent no. 2/authority may be directed to consider the representation of the writ petitioner.

5. In view of such, this Court while disposing the instant writ petition grants liberty to the writ petitioner to submit a comprehensive representation with the respondent no. 2/authority within 30 working days from the date of passing of this order.

6. Further liberty is given to the writ petitioner to submit his written notes of argument/written notes of submission along with all relevant documents for consideration of the respondent no. 2/authority.

7. It is further directed that in the event such comprehensive representation is filed by the writ petitioner with the respondent no. 2/authority within stipulated period as fixed by this Court the respondent no. 2/authority shall consider the said comprehensive representation in accordance with law and after giving an opportunity of hearing to the writ petitioner and/or his authorized representative shall pass a reasoned order and forthwith communicate the same to the writ petitioner preferably by mail, if the mail details of the writ petitioner is provided to him at the time of hearing.

8. The entire exercise as indicated hereinabove is to be completed by the respondent no. 2/authority within 60 working days from the date of receipt of the comprehensive representation to the writ petitioner. \

9. Liberty is given to the learned Advocate-on-Record to communicate the server copy of this order to the respondent no. 2/authority.

10. Respondent no. 2/authority is directed to act on the server copy of this order.

11. Before parting with, it is, however, made clear that since affidavits have not been called for, all allegations made in the instant writ petition are deemed to have been denied.

12. With the aforementioned observation, the instant writ petition being WPA 15500 of 2025 is disposed of.

13. Urgent Xerox certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all necessary formalities.

(Partha Sarathi Sen, J.)