← Library
Calcutta High CourtCO/1804/2021disposed

Susmita Ganguly Alias Susmita Bandyopadhayay v. Nirmal Kumar Bandyopadhayay

2022-01-31Hon'Ble Justice Subhasis Dasgupta3 pages

31.01.2022 Item No.7 Ct. No.7 CHC (disposed of) C.O.1804 of 2021 (Via Video Conference) Smt. Susmita Ganguly @ Susmita Bandopadhyay VS.

Sri Nirmal Kumar Bandopadhyay Mr. Soham Banerjee ...for the petitioner Mr. Sujit Gupta, Ms. Amita Gaur ...for the opposite party This is an application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking transfer of Matrimonial Suit No.1502 of 2021, from the court of learned Additional District Judge, 3rd Court, Barasat, North 24 Parganas to the court of learned Additional District Judge, Ranaghat, Nadia.

Mr. Soham Banerjee, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that after being deserted by her husband, petitioner has been staying in her parental house since 2008. Petitioner has no income of her own to maintain herself. In the meantime, petitioner has invited a case under the D.V. Act, which is pending at Ranaghat, Nadia.

Taking the grounds of hardship, harassment, distance, the petitioner has proposed the instant transfer.

Per contra, Ms. Amita Gaur, learned advocate for the opposite party submits that instant transfer application is harassive one. It is contended by opposite party that it would be quite disadvantegeous for opposite party to participate in the hearing process of Mat.Suit, in the event of case being transferred to proposed place. Opposite party is admittedly a retired person. The opposite party proposes for a neutral place, where justice may be dispensed with.

The fighting couple in this transfer application talk about their respective harassment, based on distance to be covered, financial constraints and multiplicity of decisions to come. Of course, in a case of this nature, comparative advantages, disadvantages and harassment of parties are of highest significance. And the Court has to secure a balance between the two in all probalities.

In view of the submission disclosed by both the parties, the Court is of the view that a neutral place would be the best choice to address the matrimonial differences between the parties. In that view of the matter, Barrackpore Court would be the best option, which is having suitable connectivity for availability of multiple conveyances to reach over there.

Barrackpore Court is also located at such a location,

where it is expected that the comparative disadvantages and harassment of the parties may be curtailed to a considerable degree, and in that event there will be no prejudice caused to either of the parties to this case.

With the discussion made hereinabove, the instant transfer application is disposed of directing learned Additional District Judge, 3rd Court, Barasat, North 24 Parganas to transfer the Matrimonial Suit No.1502 of 2021 to the court of learned Additional District Judge, 2nd Court, Barrackpore, North 24 Parganas, within six (06) weeks from date of communication of this order.

Both the parties are accordingly directed to ensure their respective appearance before the transferee court on 31st March, 2022.

Transferee Court, upon receipt of the case record, is directed to dispose of the pending Matrimonial Suit providing sufficient opportunities of hearing to either of the parties to this case.

Urgent certified photostat copy of this order, if applied for, shall be given to the parties as expeditiously as possible on compliance of all necessary formalities.

(Subhasis Dasgupta, J.)