← Library
Calcutta High CourtWPA/15332/2025disposed

Ruma Ruidas v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

2025-07-28Hon'Ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh4 pages

WPA 15332 of 2025 Sl.No.

28.07.2025 Court No. 35 G.S.Das Ruma Ruidas -VsThe State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Guddu Singh ... for the Petitioner(s) Ms. Sonal Sinha Ms. Shabnam Farooqi ... for the State-respondent(s) Mr. Aniruddha Bagchi, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Narendra Prasad Gupta ... for the private respondent no. 6 Re Affidavit-of-service so filed be kept with the record.

The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that her information which was sent to the police authorities particularly the Investigating Officer associated with Budbud police station in connection with Budbud PS Case No. 81 of 2025, was not given any effect. The petitioner further complains that pursuant to the information so furnished, she has been receiving threats and is also unable to enter her house.

I have considered the contentions

advanced on behalf of the petitioner as well as the report submitted on behalf of the State. The report reflects that in respect of the incident of 15.05.2025, Budbud PS Case No. 81 of 2025 was registered for investigation and, on conclusion of investigation, charge-sheet was submitted before the jurisdictional court.

Having regard to the other issues concerned, I am of the view that since a criminal court is already in seisin of the issues, the petitioner will ventilate her grievances before the jurisdictional court.

So far as the issue relating to possession is concerned, the same is to be addressed before the appropriate court having jurisdictional.

Since a criminal case has already been registered and the same is before a court, the police authority obviously would oversee, in such circumstances, that the

petitioner who happens to be a witness in the case is not suffering from any insecurity. To that effect, in case, the petitioner takes out any application before the learned court in seisin of the issues, the learned jurisdictional court, in those circumstances, would consider the threat perception of the petitioner, thereafter, pass necessary directions under the Witness Protection Scheme, 2018.

With the aforesaid observations, WPA 15332 of 2025 is disposed of.

Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of.

Report so submitted be kept with the record.

Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon'ble High Court, Calcutta.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)