← Library
Calcutta High CourtWPA/16719/2021disposed

Sumit Chatterjee v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

2022-06-21Hon'Ble Justice Shampa Sarkar2 pages

21.06.2022 Court No. 19 Item no.100 CP W.P.A. No. 16719 of 2021 Sumit Chatterjee Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Tapash K. Bhattacharya Mr. Aviroop Bhattacharya Mr. Bishnu Prosad Singha Roy ....for the petitioner.

Affidavit of service is taken on record.

The petitioner is the proposed lessor of M/s Reliance Jio Infratel Pvt. Ltd., respondent no. 8 herein.

The allegation is that although the police authorities all over West Bengal were directed to provide police protection to the respondent no. 8 when mobile towers of the said service provider were being installed, the Inspector-in-charge, Kotwali Police Station, Krishnanagar, Nadia failed and neglected to provide such protection to the respondent no. 8.

Surprisingly, the respondent no. 8 is not aggrieved. The petitioner is the land owner and the respondent no. 8 had entered into a contract with the petitioner to lease out the land for construction of the tower, upon payment of lease rent.

It appears that the respondent no. 8 had not gone ahead with the terms of the agreement. The tower has not yet been installed on the petitioner's land.

The petitioner is not getting the lease rent. Thus, the petitioner submits that as the police authorities have not given protection to the respondent no.

8, the tower has not been constructed. As a result of which, the petitioner is suffering losses.

It is the specific case of the petitioner that the local club had obstructed the respondent no. 8 from installing the mobile tower.

When the respondent no. 8 did not have any complaint either against the local club or against the police authorities, the petitioner does not have any locus to move this writ petition. The writ petition is misconceived. The petitioner is trying to enforce the contract which the petitioner had entered into with the respondent no. 8.

Remedy of the petitioner, if any, against the respondent no. 8 is before a civil court.

The writ petition is disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Parties are to act on the server copy of this order.

(Shampa Sarkar, J.)