← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM/6721/2021allowed

Sabedul @ Sabdul Ali v. State Of West Bengal

2021-11-10Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Honble Justice Ananda Kumar Mukherjee2 pages

10.11.2021 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M. 6721 of 2021 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Harishchandrapur Police Station Case No. 121 of 2021 dated 12.02.2021 under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. And In Re : Sabdul Ali @ Sabedul ...... petitioner Mr. Kazi M Rahaman ....for the petitioner Mr. Saibal Bapuli Mr. Arijit Ganguly Mr. Sanjib Kumar Daan ....for the State Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner was falsely implicated.

Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the statement recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr. P. C.). Considering the materials in the case diary and considering the past relationship of the petitioner with the defacto complainant, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the

satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further conditions that the petitioner shall meet the investigating officer once in a month until further orders and on condition that the petitioner shall appear before the jurisdictional court on every date fixed and pray for regular bail within a period of four weeks from date. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Ananda Kumar Mukherjee, J.)