Harekrishna Halder And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

22.07.2022 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M.(A) 3478 of 2022 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Chanditala Police Station Case No. 81 of 2022 dated 11.03.2022 under Sections 498(A)/406/307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

And In Re : Harekrishna Halder & Anr.

...... petitioners Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury ....for the petitioners Mr. Bidyut Kumar Roy Ms. Sima Biswas ....for the State Petitioners pray for anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that, the 'stridhan' articles were seized. The petitioners were falsely implicated. The husband is in custody. Considering the fact that the husband is in custody and considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners therein, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the

petitioner no.

(Harekrishna Halder) shall meet the Investigating Officer once a month till the conclusion of the investigation and petitioner no. 2 (Sanaka Halder) shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)