Subhankar Kumar v. State Of West Bengal

22.07.2022 Serial no. 37 [Dd] (Anticipatory bail) (Rejected) CRM (A) 3495 of 2022 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Polba Police Station Case No. 14 of 2022 dated 20.01.2022 under Sections 392/397 of the Indian Penal Code adding section 109 of the Indian Penal Code dated 13.04.2022 (G.R. Case No. 162/2022) -AndIn the matter of : Subhankar Kumar ... ...Petitioner Mr. Prasenjit Debnath, Ms. Punam Basu, Advocates ... ... For the Petitioner Ms. Sreyashee Biswas, Advocate ... ...For the State Petitioner prays for anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the police filed charge sheet and, therefore, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. Other co-accused was enlargted on bail by the jurisdictional Court.

Learned advocate appearing for the State submits that the petitioner is involved in the dacoity. He refers to the materials in the case diary implicating the petitioner. Considering the fact that there are materials in the case dairy implicating the petitioner in the incident of dacoity, we are not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.

CRM (A) 3495 of 2022 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)