← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/3496/2022allowed

Hajo Bibi @ Hajo Khatun @ Hajo v. State Of West Bengal

2022-07-25Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Bibhas Ranjan De2 pages

C.R.M. (A) 3496 of 2022 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Chanchal Police Station Case No. 906 of 2021 dated 15/10/2021, (corresponding to G.R.

No.-2463/2021) under Sections 498A/304B of the Indian Penal Code.

In the matter of: Hajo Bibi @ Hajo Khatun @ Hajo ....petitioner.

Mr. Arup Sarkar Mr. Sourav Mukherjee ...for the petitioner.

Mr. Tanmay Kumar Ghosh, Ld. Sr. Government Advocate Mr. Arindam Sen ...for the State.

Petitioner prays for anticipatory bail.

(AD) 25.07.2022 Court No.29 (Allowed) Considering the fact that the husband and the father-inlaw of the victim was enlarged on bail by the jurisdictional Court and considering the fact that the police filed charge sheet and considering the fact that the post-mortem report of the victim suggests suicide, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default, the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference

to this Court.

The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. C.R.M. (A) 3496 of 2022 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)