Faruk Sk @ Faruk Sekh v. State Of West Bengal

22.07.2022.

14.

Ct.No.28.

as (Allowed) C.R.M. (NDPS) 818 of 2022 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Special Case No.04 of 2022 arising out of Kaliachak P. S. Case No.1439 of 2021 dated 27.12.2021 under Sections 21(c)/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act read with Section 27A of the Drugs and Cosmetic Act. In the matter of : Faruk Sk. @ Faruk Sekh.

.... Petitioner.

Ms. Minoti Gomes, Mr. Mounick Ghosh.

...for the Petitioner.

Mr. Ranabir Ray Chowdhury, Mr. Mainak Gupta.

...for the State.

Heard the learned Counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.

Petitioner is in custody for about 27 days. It is submitted no narcotic substance was recovered from his possession. Coaccuseds similarly circumstanced with the petitioner have been granted bail/pre-arrest bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

We have considered the materials on record. No narcotic substance was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. His complicity has transpired from the statement of coaccuseds before a police officer which is inadmissible in evidence.

Under such circumstances, we are of the opinion that the petitioner has been able to rebut the statutory restrictions under Section 37 of the N. D. P. S. Act and as co-accuseds similarly circumstanced with the petitioner have been granted bail/pre-arrest bail, we are inclined to extend the privilege of bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Judge, Special Court under N.D.P.S. Act, Malda subject to condition that the petitioner shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

In the event the petitioner fails to appear before the Trial Court without any justifiable cause, the trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail in accordance with law without further reference to this Court.

This application for bail is, thus, disposed of. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)