Dipankar Mondal v. State Of West Bengal

11.08.2022 Serial no.3 Aloke CRM (A) 3501 of 2022 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Balurghat Women Police Station Case No. 45 of 2022 dated 24.05.2022 under Sections 417/376(2)(N) of the Indian Penal Code. -AndIn the matter of : Dipankar Mondal ... ... Petitioner Mr. Biswajit Manna, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. Prasun Kr. Dutta, Advocate Mr. Subrato Roy, Advocate ... ...For the State Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

There are materials in the case diary implicating the petitioner.

Apparently, the petitioner took money from the de facto complainant. There was physical relationship between the petitioner and the de facto complainant.

In view of the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner therein as transpiring from the materials in the case diary, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. CRM (A) 3501 of 2022 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)