Bimala Sarkar v. Union Of India & ORS.

4.8.2025 Sl. No. 8.

Ct.No.7 samarpita WPA 13242 of 2010 Dilip Roy Chowdhury & Anr.

Vs.

Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.

None appears on behalf of both the parties, nor any accommodation being sought for.

Challenging the legality of the notice issued by the secured creditor under Section 13(4) of the SARFASI Act, 2002, the writ petition was preferred.

Due to existence of efficacious alternative remedy this writ petition can't be entertained.

In view thereof, the writ petition being WPA 13242 of 2010 is dismissed.

No order as to costs.

(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)